Love, attract, in addition to suppression off thoughts regarding personal alternatives

Gonzaga, G. C., Haselton, Yards. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, Yards. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and you can Peoples Behavior, 29(2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. M. (2000). The place out of accessory inside the person mating. Summary of Standard Therapy, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, An effective. (2002). Internet sites contradiction reviewed. Diary away from Public Points, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet sites paradox: A personal tech one decrease public wedding and psychological really-are? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, R.Yards., & Fields, J. M. (2001). Matter, timing, and you may time of marriages and divorces. Latest Population Profile, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Bureau, 2005).

Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional research of closeness, passions, and you can connection: Investigations the new presumptions of the triangular principle out of like. Emotional Profile, 90(3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.step three.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Feeling most useful in the doing worse: Public comparisons within personal dating. Record out of Character and you may Societal Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. An excellent., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The latest implicit cognition of close rivalry. Log regarding Character and Personal Therapy, 97(1), 74–87.

A great. (2001)mitment and you can dating repair components

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention to help you attractive choice: Brand new progressed psychology out of dating fix. Advancement and you will Individual Behavior, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential studies from argument and you will agreement inside distressed and you will nondistressed marital lovers. Diary regarding Consulting and Systematic Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. A great., Eco-friendly, A. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Matchmaking development on the internet: What is the huge appeal? Diary of Societal Activities, 58(1), 9–29.

The advantages of self-confident illusions: Idealization in addition to construction out-of satisfaction within the romantic relationship

Neff, L. A great., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-assessment intentions in intimate matchmaking: A model of globally improvement and you may certain confirmation. Within the P. Noller & J. A. Feeney (Eds.), Information ents regarding study of couples correspondence hvad koster det for en postordrebrud (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge College Drive.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the client-therapist bond through the lens regarding connection theory. Psychotherapy: Idea, Search, Behavior, Degree, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The brand new public overseeing system: Increased sensitiveness so you’re able to social cues due to the fact an adaptive a reaction to societal exception. Inside K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), Brand new societal outcast: Ostracism, social exemption, rejection, and you will bullying (pp. 213–226). Nyc, NY: Mindset Force.

Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). In the world and particular relational activities about experience of public relationships. Record out of Identification and you can Public Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A beneficial., Tran, S., ). Accessory and recommendations looking to in the personal relationship. Personality and Public Mindset Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and certain accessory representations within the adulthood: Is there a relationship?. Journal From Personal And private Relationship, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. In the J. Harvey & An excellent. Wenzel (Eds.), Romantic romantic dating: Repairs and improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An excellent. D. (2000). Projection yourself perception certainly one of spouses as a function of the newest similarity inside their common knowledge. Identity And you can Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, Yards. P. (1980). Ramifications of salience out of extrinsic rewards for the liking and you will loving. Diary off Character and you may Personal Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.